The unfolding legal drama between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni has become a major talking point in Hollywood. Lively’s accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation against her It Ends With Us director and co-star Baldoni have ignited a firestorm. Given her well-established views on Hollywood celebrity culture and public scandals it is not difficult to imagine how Candace Owens likely perceives this situation. In fact anyone familiar with Owens' commentary could probably predict her stance without much effort.
Blake Lively has amended her lawsuit adding further details to her allegations against Justin Baldoni. These allegations include claims that other women on the set of It Ends With Us also felt uncomfortable due to Baldoni’s behavior. Baldoni for his part has denied these allegations and launched counter-suits against Lively her husband Ryan Reynolds and even The New York Times. This high-profile and messy legal fight is exactly the kind of scenario that often draws commentary and analysis particularly from figures known for their strong opinions on celebrity matters. Candace Owens certainly fits that description.
Candace Owens Probably Sees The Lively Vs. Baldoni Situation As Typical Hollywood Hypocrisy
Celebrity Scandals Are Often Targets Of Owens' Commentary
Candace Owens has made a name for herself by offering commentary on various cultural and political issues and celebrity scandals are no exception. She frequently critiques what she perceives as hypocrisy and moral failings within Hollywood. Therefore it is highly probable that Owens views the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni dispute through this lens of Hollywood hypocrisy. She likely sees it as another example of the gap between celebrities' public personas and their private actions.
Considering Owens' past remarks on similar situations it's reasonable to assume she may interpret Lively's allegations with a degree of skepticism. Owens often expresses distrust of mainstream narratives particularly those emerging from liberal Hollywood circles. She might suggest that there is more to the story than is being presented by mainstream media outlets like CNN which have covered Lively's accusations extensively.
Furthermore Owens might use this case to bolster her existing criticisms of the entertainment industry. She could argue that this legal battle exposes a darker side of Hollywood a place where power dynamics and alleged misconduct are rampant. This perspective would align perfectly with her broader critiques of celebrity culture as inauthentic and morally compromised.
Baldoni's "Feminist" Advocacy Is Ripe For Candace Owens' Scrutiny
Hypocrisy In Public Figures Is Often Highlighted By Owens
A particularly interesting element of this case that Candace Owens would likely seize upon is the mention of Justin Baldoni’s “feminist advocacy” in Lively’s amended complaint. The lawsuit states that after Baldoni was made aware of Lively's and other women’s discomfort “he turned his TED Talk and ‘feminist’ advocacy on its head.” This detail is almost tailor-made for Owens’ brand of commentary which frequently targets perceived inconsistencies in liberal or progressive viewpoints.
Owens has been critical of what she sees as performative or inauthentic displays of feminism particularly within celebrity culture. She might argue that Baldoni’s alleged behavior directly contradicts his public image as a feminist advocate. If Owens adopts this angle she would likely present Baldoni as a prime example of Hollywood figures who use progressive rhetoric for personal gain or to mask questionable behavior. This narrative would resonate strongly with her audience who often share her skepticism towards mainstream liberal narratives.
Moreover Owens might use Baldoni’s case to issue a broader critique of modern feminism itself. She could argue that cases like this reveal the failures or contradictions within contemporary feminist movements suggesting they are more about public image and less about genuine principles. This line of argument is consistent with her frequent criticisms of social justice movements and identity politics.
The SNL Joke And Public Spectacle Fit Owens' Narrative Of Hollywood's Out-Of-Touch Nature
Public Reaction And Media Coverage Are Key Elements In Celebrity Scandals
The public reaction to the Lively-Baldoni legal battle including Ryan Reynolds’ joke on SNL and Bethenny Frankel’s commentary is another area ripe for Candace Owens’ analysis. Reynolds' seemingly lighthearted joke about the situation and Frankel’s praise of it as “brilliant” marketing could be interpreted by Owens as further evidence of Hollywood’s detachment from reality.
Owens might criticize Reynolds’ joke as trivializing serious allegations of sexual harassment. She could argue that making light of such issues on a platform like SNL demonstrates a lack of empathy and a prioritization of entertainment over genuine concern for victims. This would feed into her narrative of Hollywood elites being out of touch with the concerns of ordinary people and insensitive to serious issues.
Similarly Owens might view Bethenny Frankel’s praise of the SNL joke as further proof of Hollywood’s self-serving nature. Frankel’s focus on the “brilliant” marketing aspect could be seen by Owens as prioritizing image and public relations over addressing the substance of Lively’s claims. This perspective would align with Owens’ broader cynicism about the motivations of celebrities and their publicists in managing scandals.
The fact that the legal battle is playing out so publicly with leaked text messages and ongoing media dissection is also something Owens might find noteworthy. She could comment on the spectacle of it all arguing that it is yet another example of celebrity drama designed to distract from more important issues or to provide entertainment at the expense of genuine accountability.
Predictable Yet Potentially Scathing Commentary Is Likely From Owens
In conclusion Candace Owens's likely reaction to the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni legal battle is almost certainly predictable to anyone familiar with her style of commentary. She would likely view it as another instance of Hollywood hypocrisy using it to critique celebrity culture modern feminism and the perceived moral failings of the entertainment industry. Her analysis would probably be critical skeptical and align with her established viewpoints offering a potentially scathing assessment of the entire situation. While her exact words remain unsaid her likely perspective is clear: this is just another day in Hollywood and not in a good way.